In 2025, lawmakers continued to introduce laws that roll back reproductive rights and further threaten the health and safety of Idahoans. The most extreme bills would have established new and unusual legal and policy frameworks—like assigning personhood rights to fetuses—that assert moral and religious ideals in place of science and research-backed medicine.
Reproductive Rights Wins
Thankfully, and in partnership with community organizations like Planned Parenthood and Legal Voice, we defeated every fetal personhood bill introduced this year. We also stopped a public funding scheme for fake, anti-abortion “crisis” pregnancy centers. These sham clinics are dangerous: they lack oversight, any meaningful professional standards, and often do not staff any actual healthcare professionals.
Additionally, we protected access to mifepristone and misoprostol, which are common and safe medications used for abortion and miscarriage care—a celebrated success that benefits every Idahoan.
Setbacks for Reproductive Rights
Not everything was a win this year in our reproductive rights work. Lawmakers failed to clarify the limits of Idaho’s criminal abortion laws or provide meaningful protection to healthcare providers. Rep. Ilana Rubel (D-18, Boise) attempted to restore the right to abortion in Idaho—an effort that was ultimately unsuccessful.
Abortion rights rollbacks also appeared in legislation addressing public education, speech, and even financial services. A new law requires students, starting as early as fifth grade, to view a deceitful “fetal development” video linked to an extremist anti-abortion organization, despite the video’s well-documented medical and scientific inaccuracies. This video is dangerous in Idaho, where our draconian abortion laws threaten doctors and where students’ right to comprehensive sex and sexuality education is under attack.
What's Next
We expect lawmakers will continue to test legal and political limits in their quest to fulfill campaign promises and policy agendas that baldly attack bodily autonomy. And as threats to reproductive rights grow more nuanced and move into uncharted legal territory, our work continues.